【Hacker News搬运】BorgBackup 2.0支持Rclone——除了SSH之外，还有70多家云提供商

[hackernews]

Title: BorgBackup 2.0 supports Rclone – over 70 cloud providers in addition to SSH

BorgBackup 2.0支持Rclone——除了SSH之外，还有70多家云提供商

Text:

hn link

Url: https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/2.0.0b11/changes.html#version-2-0-0b11-2024-09-26

由于我是一个文本和信息处理的AI，我无法直接访问外部链接。但是，我可以帮助您总结和翻译BorgBackup 2.0.0b11版本更改的相关内容。

首先，我会基于您提供的链接内容进行总结：

BorgBackup 2.0.0b11版本（2024年9月26日发布）的更改可能包括以下内容：

1. **新功能**：可能添加了新的备份策略、改进的用户界面功能或其他增强特性。
2. **改进和修复**：对现有功能进行了优化，可能修复了之前版本中的bug。
3. **文档更新**：更新了官方文档，可能包括新的示例、最佳实践或对现有内容的澄清。

接下来，我将翻译上述总结内容为中文：

BorgBackup 2.0.0b11版本（2024年9月26日发布）的更新可能包含以下内容：

1. **新增功能**：可能新增了新的备份策略、改进的用户界面特性或其他增强功能。
2. **改进与修复**：对现有功能进行了优化，可能修复了先前版本中的错误。
3. **文档更新**：更新了官方文档，可能包括新的示例、最佳实践或对现有内容的说明。

请注意，这些信息是基于一般版本更新的常见特点进行的推测。要获取确切的更改详情，您需要访问提供的链接，阅读BorgBackup官方文档中的具体更新内容。

Post by: AdaX

Comments:

Helmut10001: BorgBackup user here and really happy. It was a set and forget for me and after 7 years, the deduplicated backup is still working flawlessly each week. I recommend pairing it with borgmatic [1], which helps to design away some of the complexities of the underlying borg backup.<p>[1]: <a href="https://github.com/borgmatic-collective/borgmatic">https://github.com/borgmatic-collective/borgmatic</a>

Helmut10001: BorgBackup用户在这里，真的很开心。这对我来说是一个设置和遗忘，7年后，重复数据消除的备份每周仍然完美运行。我建议将其与borgulac[1]配对，这有助于消除底层borg备份的一些复杂性<p> [1]：<a href=“https:&#x2F；/ github.com&#x2F-borgmatic collective&#x2F/borgmaic”>https:&quot&#x2F；github.com；硼岩浆集体；硼岩浆岩</a>

cstuder: If you're looking for cheap online storage for your backups know this: A Microsoft 365 Single subscription comes with 1 TB of OneDrive space (Family subscriptions with 1 TB per person).<p>I've been using it with restic + rclone successfully for years. It's not very fast, but works.

cstuder: 如果您；正在为您的备份寻找廉价的在线存储空间，请知道：Microsoft 365 Single订阅附带1 TB的OneDrive空间（家庭订阅每人1 TB）<p> 我；多年来，我一直在restic+rclone上成功使用它。它；它不是很快，但很有效。

0xbadcafebee: It's kind of ridiculous that there is better tooling for Kubernetes to sync files two ways than there is for the Linux desktop. Rclone is a maze of options, which vary based on version/distro. The configurator is a slow readline console script without enough information. The one decent GUI for Rclone has been abandoned, and despite being able to save "tasks", had no ability to just... schedule one every 10 minutes. And yet if you go into most distros and look at packaged Internet apps, or things on Flatpak, you will find 1,000 different open source GUIs for an RSS reader, BitTorrent client, or chat client.<p>I would love it if there were some kind of "Linux Desktop co-op", with a couple of staff. Users pay membership dues, vote on apps/features, and some devs get paid to develop it, in addition to "resume fame" that can translate over to a higher paying gig. But something tells me the Linux Desktop is so small and nerd-focused that we'd just end up funding more RSS readers and chat clients.

0xbadcafebee: 它；Kubernetes有比Linux桌面更好的工具来以两种方式同步文件，这有点荒谬。Rclone是一个迷宫般的选项，根据版本而有所不同；发行版。配置器是一个没有足够信息的慢速读行控制台脚本。Rclone的一个体面的图形用户界面已被放弃，尽管能够保存&quot；任务”；，没有能力只是。。。每10分钟安排一次。然而，如果你进入大多数发行版，看看打包的互联网应用程序，或者Flatpak上的东西，你会发现1000种不同的RSS阅读器、BitTorrent客户端或聊天客户端的开源GUI<p> 如果有某种&quot；Linux桌面合作社”；，有几个工作人员。用户支付会员费，对应用程序进行投票&#x2F；除了“；恢复名誉&quot；这可以转化为更高报酬的演出。但有一件事告诉我，Linux桌面太小，太书呆子化了；d最终只会资助更多的RSS阅读器和聊天客户端。

scorpioxy: Oh very interesting. This has been a requested feature for a while especially with the rise in popularity and the decreased cost of object storage.<p>Borg working with object storage was not supported though some people did use it that way. From my understanding, most would duplicate a repo and upload instead of borg directly writing/manipulating it. This could problematic if the original repo was corrupt as now the corruption would be duplicated. So this will make things much easier and allow for a more streamlined workflow. Having the tool support rclone instead of specific services seems like a wise and more future-proof choice to me.

scorpioxy: 哦，非常有趣。一段时间以来，这一直是人们所要求的功能，尤其是随着流行度的提高和对象存储成本的降低<p> 博格使用对象存储是不受支持的，尽管有些人确实这样使用它。据我所知，大多数人会复制一个repo并上传，而不是直接写borg；操纵它。如果原始回购存在腐败，这可能会产生问题，因为现在腐败会再次发生。因此，这将使事情变得更容易，并允许更精简的工作流程。对我来说，使用工具支持rclone而不是特定服务似乎是一个明智且更经得起未来考验的选择。

mendym: is there a reason to use the borg encryption[1] over rclone crypt[2] or vise versa?<p>1. <a href="https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/2.0.0b11/quickstart.html#repository-encryption" rel="nofollow">https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/2.0.0b11/quickstart.htm...</a>
2. <a href="https://rclone.org/crypt/" rel="nofollow">https://rclone.org/crypt/</a>

mendym: 是否有理由在rclone crypt[2]上使用borg加密[1]，反之亦然<p> 1<a href=“https:”borgbackup.readthedocs.io“2.0.0b11”quickstart.html#存储库加密“rel=”nofollow“>https:”&#x2F；borgbackup.readthedocs.io；en■；2.0.0b11；quickstart.htm</一2.<a href=“https:&#x2F；rclone.org&#x2F-crypt&#x2O；rel=“nofollow”>https:&#x2F；rclone.org；crypt</一