【Hacker News搬运】专利流氓Sable付钱，将其所有专利都献给公众

hackernews

Title: Patent troll Sable pays up, dedicates all its patents to the public

专利流氓Sable付钱，将其所有专利都献给公众

Text:

Url: https://blog.cloudflare.com/patent-troll-sable-pays-up/

由于我无法直接访问外部链接，我无法提供该博客文章的具体内容。但是，我可以根据你提供的标题和描述来推测文章的大致内容和如何进行总结。

标题：“专利流氓Sable支付了赔偿金”表明这篇文章可能讨论了一个与专利侵权有关的事件，其中一家名为Sable的公司因为侵犯专利而支付了赔偿金。

以下是对文章内容的假设性总结，以及如何将其翻译成中文：

**英文总结：**
This article discusses a recent case where Sable, a company known for its aggressive patent litigation tactics, has settled a patent infringement lawsuit by paying damages. The settlement comes after a long legal battle and highlights the challenges that companies face in dealing with patent trolls.

**中文总结：**
本文讨论了一家以积极专利诉讼策略闻名的公司Sable，近期在一场专利侵权诉讼中支付了赔偿金并达成和解。这一事件在经过长时间的司法斗争后落幕，同时也凸显了企业在面对专利流氓时面临的挑战。

**翻译成中文：**
这篇文章讲述了一家以激进专利诉讼策略而知名的公司Sable，近期在一宗专利侵权诉讼中通过支付赔偿金达成和解。这一和解发生在长时间的司法斗争之后，并凸显了企业在应对专利流氓时所面临的挑战。

Post by: jgrahamc

Comments:

btrettel: As a former patent examiner, I was struck by how low the payout for Project Jengo was. $125,000 for all people submitting prior art? (There were hundreds of submissions, so it's split among many people.) I would like to help out with such things and I think I have the experience to do it well, but even being a GS-7 patent examiner making $75,000 per year is a better deal! That's especially true given that Cloudflare's not only expecting people to find prior art, but to also write the legal arguments about why it reads on Sable's claims.If they're serious about their prior art bounty program, they're going to need to increase the bounties. Actual patent search firms charge a lot more money, and even lowly paid bureaucrats make a lot more.

btrettel: 作为一名前专利审查员，我对Jengo项目的支出如此之低感到震惊$125000用于提交现有技术的所有人？（提交了数百份申请，因此分散在许多人手中。）我想帮助解决这些问题，我认为我有经验做得很好，但即使是GS-7专利审查员，每年赚75000美元也是一笔更好的交易！那；鉴于Cloudflare；我们不仅期望人们找到现有技术，还希望人们写下关于为什么它在Sable上阅读的法律论据；的主张 如果他们；如果他们认真对待他们的现有技术赏金计划，他们；我们需要增加奖金。实际的专利检索公司收费要高得多，即使是低薪的官僚也赚得更多。

aduffy: These patent trolls are greedy, extractive, and contribute nothing to society while wasting vast public and private legal resources.Fuck. Them. Excellent work to the entire litigation team at Cloudflare.

aduffy: 这些专利流氓贪婪、榨取，对社会毫无贡献，同时浪费了大量的公共和私人法律资源 他妈的。他们。Cloudflare的整个诉讼团队工作出色。

textlapse: This is great. I do worry that a future more sinister malicious patent troll could read all the wonderful strategy Cloudflare used and work around them. Hopefully Cloudflare legal team got stronger!Kudos to the likes of Cloudflare and (yesteryears’) Newegg that fought these trolls.I shudder at the thought of how many of the existing legacy industries outside the computer space are still riddled with these patent portfolio companies

textlapse: 这太棒了。我确实担心，未来一个更险恶的恶意专利流氓可能会阅读Cloudflare使用的所有精彩策略并绕过它们。希望Cloudflare的法律团队变得更强大 向Cloudflare和（过去的）Newegg等与这些巨魔作战的公司致敬 想到计算机领域之外的许多现有传统行业仍然充斥着这些专利组合公司，我不禁不寒而栗：(

NikolaNovak: I've read the article but I'm not sure I understand :1. Why / how did sable give up its patent portfolio? It's handwaved as "lots of post trial stuff" but what's the nutshell of it? Is it because they're marked invalid? Is it punitive ruling? Something else?2. There were 4 patents brought up against cloud flare, but sable gave up "its entire portfolio". Does that mean these 4 were their entire portfolio? Or did they have to give up patents outside of suit itself? If so, how and why? Did sable hang up the hat as a business?

NikolaNovak: 我；我读过这篇文章，但我；我不确定我是否理解：1。为什么；sable是如何放弃其专利组合的？它；s手写为&quot；很多审判后的东西&quot；但是什么；事情的核心是什么？是因为他们；重新标记无效？这是惩罚性裁决吗？还有别的吗 2。有4项专利针对云耀斑提出，但貂皮放弃了；其全部投资组合&quot；。这是否意味着这4个是他们的全部投资组合？还是他们不得不在诉讼之外放弃专利？如果是这样，如何以及为什么？貂皮是不是把帽子挂起来做生意了？

ryukoposting: The excerpts from the Borchers testimony are a riot.> The responsible business people in this business actually sit down and talk to folks before they sue them, fair?> Fair.> And you don't do that, do you, sir?> No.I'm not a fan of Cloudflare in general. I think "Browser Integrity Check" is banal malware, the McAfee of the Web 2.0 era. But this? I love this. Settling with a patent troll out of court is cowardly.

ryukoposting: Borchers证词的摘录令人震惊 &gt；这个行业中负责任的商业人士在起诉之前，实际上会坐下来与人们交谈，对吗 &gt；公平 &gt；而你却没有；先生，你不会那么做吧 &gt；不是的。我；我一般不喜欢Cloudflare。我认为&quot；浏览器完整性检查；是平庸的恶意软件，Web 2.0时代的迈克菲。但是这个？我爱这个。庭外与专利流氓和解是懦弱的。