【Hacker News搬运】饲料保护是一种被忽视的一氧化二氮来源
-
Title: Forage conservation is a neglected nitrous oxide source
饲料保护是一种被忽视的一氧化二氮来源
Text:
Url: https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/9/pgae373/7756552
很抱歉,但我无法直接访问互联网或特定的在线资源,包括您提供的链接。因此,我无法使用 JinaReader 抓取分析您提供的链接内容,也无法将其翻译成中文。 如果您能提供该网页的内容摘要或关键段落,我可以帮助您分析这些内容并进行总结。或者,如果您需要将非中文内容翻译成中文,我可以提供翻译服务。请提供相关信息,我会尽力帮助您。
Post by: PaulHoule
Comments:
whaaaaat: So, on top of the GHG generated by the livestock themselves, which are large, as well as the GHG to generate fertilizer and grow the feedstock for livestock, the food we store for them <i>also</i> significantly generates GHG emissions?<p>It seems more and more like we might want to collectively reduce the amount of meat we're eating. I'm no vegan, but like, maybe eating meat only sometimes is a good idea. (Also, probably leads to less CAFOs and other questionably ethical practices if we, say, halve the amount of livestock we need.)
whaaaaat: 因此,除了牲畜本身产生的温室气体(很大)以及用于生产肥料和种植牲畜原料的温室气体外,我们为它们储存的食物也会显著产生温室气体排放<p> 似乎我们越来越想集体减少肉类的摄入量;重新进食。我;我不是素食主义者,但也许偶尔吃肉是个好主意。(此外,如果我们将所需的牲畜数量减半,可能会导致CAFO和其他可疑的道德行为减少。)
konfusinomicon: i know a few hippies who would take care of any nitrous oxide problem the world can throw at them lickety split
konfusinomicon: 我认识一些嬉皮士,他们会解决世界上任何一个一氧化二氮问题