【Hacker News搬运】《越坏越好》（1991）

hackernews

Title: The Rise of Worse Is Better (1991)

《越坏越好》（1991）

Text:

Url: https://www.dreamsongs.com/RiseOfWorseIsBetter.html

很抱歉，作为一个AI，我无法直接访问或分析外部网站的内容。不过，我可以帮助你理解如何使用JinaReader这样的工具来抓取和总结网页内容，以及如果内容不是中文，如何进行翻译。

以下是一个使用JinaReader进行内容抓取、分析和总结的步骤概述，以及如何将非中文内容翻译成中文：

1. **安装和设置JinaReader**：
   - 首先，你需要安装JinaReader。这通常涉及到从源代码库中克隆或下载JinaReader，并按照其文档中的说明进行配置。

2. **抓取网页内容**：
   - 使用JinaReader的抓取功能，你可以指定要抓取的URL（在这个例子中是`https://www.dreamsongs.com/RiseOfWorseIsBetter.html`）。
   - JinaReader将解析网页，提取文本、图片和其他媒体内容。

3. **分析内容**：
   - 一旦抓取到内容，你可以使用JinaReader内置的分析工具来提取关键信息，如标题、摘要、关键词等。
   - 你也可以使用NLP（自然语言处理）技术来进一步分析内容，比如情感分析、主题建模等。

4. **翻译非中文内容**：
   - 如果抓取到的内容不是中文，你可以使用在线翻译服务或集成翻译API来将其翻译成中文。
   - 例如，你可以使用Google Translate API或百度翻译API。以下是一个使用Google Translate API进行翻译的伪代码示例：

```python
from google.cloud import translate_v2 as translate

def translate_text(text, target='zh-CN'):
    client = translate.Client()
    result = client.translate(text, target_language=target)
    return result['translatedText']

# 假设你有一个抓取到的非中文文本
non_chinese_text = "This is a sample non-Chinese text."
translated_text = translate_text(non_chinese_text)
print(translated_text)

总结内容：
- 最后，你可以使用JinaReader的分析结果和翻译后的文本来编写总结。
- 总结应该包括主要观点、关键信息和任何其他重要细节。

请注意，上述步骤是概念性的，具体实现将取决于JinaReader的实际功能和你所使用的翻译API的具体细节。如果你需要具体的代码示例或进一步的帮助，你可能需要查阅JinaReader和所选翻译API的官方文档。

        
## Post by: t14n
        
### Comments: 
        
**hammock**: There was an article posted on here[1] a while back that I only just found again, introducing the term &quot;expedience.&quot; The idea was that we think we live in a world where people have to have &quot;the best&quot; sweater, be on &quot;the best&quot; social network, drive &quot;the best&quot; car, etc. But when you look at what really WINS, it&#x27;s not the best, it&#x27;s the most &quot;expedient&quot; - i.e. sufficiently good, with built-in social proof, inoculated of buyer&#x27;s remorse, etc.<p>Is Amazon &quot;the best&quot; place to go shopping? No, you might find better prices on individual items if you put a little more work into it, but it&#x27;s the most expedient. Is Facebook&#x2F;Instagram&#x2F;Tiktok&#x2F;insert here &quot;the best&quot; social network? No, but it is the most accessible, easy-to-use, useful one. Is a Tesla (perhaps outdated example since X) &quot;the best&quot; car - no, but it is the most expedient.<p>There is a tangent here that intersects with refinement culture as well. Among the group of society that (subconsciously) care about these &quot;expedient&quot; choices, you see everyone and everything start to look the same<p>[1]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tinaja.computer&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;13&#x2F;expedience.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tinaja.computer&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;13&#x2F;expedience.html</a>
> **hammock**: 不久前，我刚刚在这里找到一篇文章，介绍了&quot；权宜之计&“；我们的想法是，我们认为我们生活在一个人们必须拥有&quot；最好的&quot；毛衣，穿上”；最好的&quot；社交网络，驱动”；最好的&quot；但是当你看到真正获胜的是什么时，它；这不是最好的；是最&quot；“权宜之计”即足够好，具有内在的社会证明，接种了买方疫苗；<p>是亚马逊吗&quot；最好的&quot；去哪里购物？不，如果你再努力一点，你可能会发现个别商品的价格更优惠，但它；这是最方便的。脸书是；Instagram；Tiktok；在此处插入&quot；最好的&quot；社交网络？没有，但它是最容易访问、最易于使用、最有用的。是特斯拉（也许是自X以来过时的例子）&quot；最好的&quot；车——不，但这是最方便的<p> 这里也有一条切线与精致文化相交。在（潜意识里）关心这些的社会群体中&quot；权宜之计”；选择后，您会看到每个人和每件事都开始看起来一样<p>[1]<a href=“https:”tinaja.computer“2017”10”13“expeditions.html”rel=“nofollow”>https:”&#x2F；tinaja.计算机；2017年；10°F；13°F；快捷方式.html</a>
            
**bccdee**: &gt; Both early Unix and C compilers had simple structures, are easy to port, require few machine resources to run, and provide about 50%-80% of what you want from an operating system and programming language.<p>&gt; Unix and C are the ultimate computer viruses.<p>The key argument behind worse-is-better is that an OS which is easy to implement will dominate the market in an ecosystem with many competing hardware standards. Operating systems, programming languages, and software in general have not worked this way in a long time.<p>Rust is not worse-is-better, but it&#x27;s become very popular anyway, because LLVM can cross-compile for anything. Kubernetes is not worse-is-better, but nobody needs to reimplement the k8s control plane. React is not worse-is-better, but it only needs to run on the one web platform, so it&#x27;s fine.<p>Worse-is-better only applies to things that require an ecosystem of independent implementers providing compatible front-ends for diverging back-ends, and we&#x27;ve mostly standardized beyond that now.
> **bccdee**: &gt；早期的Unix和C编译器结构简单，易于移植，运行所需的机器资源很少，并且提供了操作系统和编程语言中大约50%-80%的功能<p> &gt；Unix和C是终极计算机病毒<p> 更坏就是更好背后的关键论点是，一个易于实施的操作系统将在一个有许多相互竞争的硬件标准的生态系统中主导市场。操作系统、编程语言和软件在很长一段时间内都没有以这种方式工作<p> 生锈不是越坏越好，但它；无论如何，LLVM变得非常流行，因为LLVM可以交叉编译任何东西。Kubernetes不是越差越好，但没有人需要重新实现k8s控制平面。React不是越差越好，但它只需要在一个web平台上运行，所以它；很好<p> 更糟糕的是更好的只适用于需要独立实施者生态系统为不同后端提供兼容前端的事情，我们；我现在已经基本标准化了。
            
**ezekiel68**: I&#x27;m always happy whenever this old article goes viral. For two reasons: First, learning to accept the fact that the better solutions doesn&#x27;t always win has helped me keep may sanity over more than two decades in the tech industry. And second, I&#x27;m old enough to have a pretty good idea what the guy meant when he replied, &quot;It takes a tough man to make a tender chicken.&quot;
> **ezekiel68**: 我；每当这篇旧文章在网上疯传时，我总是很高兴。出于两个原因：第一，学会接受更好的解决方案不会改变这一事实；在科技行业的二十多年里，t always win帮助我保持了理智。第二，我；我已经长大了，能很好地理解那家伙回答时的意思了；做一只嫩鸡需要一个硬汉&“；
            
**gpderetta**: &gt; The good news is that in 1995 we will have a good operating system and programming language; the bad news is that they will be Unix and C++.<p>And 30 years later they show few signs of letting go.
> **gpderetta**: &gt；好消息是，1995年我们将有一个好的操作系统和编程语言；坏消息是，它们将是Unix和C++<p> 30年后，他们几乎没有放弃的迹象。
            
**th43o2i4234234**: The critical point of the article holds true of everything in human social networks (be it religion&#x2F;culture&#x2F;philosophy&#x2F;apps&#x2F;industry...).<p>If you don&#x27;t achieve virality, you&#x27;re as good as dead. Once a episteme&#x2F;meme spreads like wild-fire there&#x27;s very little chance for a reassessment based on value&#x2F;function - because the scope is now the big axis of valuation.<p>It&#x27;s actually worse because humanity is now a single big borg. Even 30-40 years back, there were sparsely connected pools where different species of fish could exist - not any more. The elites of every single country is a part of the Anglosphere, and their populations mimic them (eventually).<p>This tumbling towards widespread mono-memetism in <i>every single</i> sphere of life is deeply dissatisfying about the modern human life, not just for PL&#x2F;OS&#x2F;... but also for culture etc.<p>Anthropocene of humanity itself.
> **th43o2i4234234**: 这篇文章的关键点适用于人类社交网络中的一切（无论是宗教、文化、哲学、应用程序、行业……）<p> 如果你不这样做；你无法达到病毒式传播；就像死了一样。一旦认识；模因在那里像野火一样蔓延；基于价值进行重新评估的机会很小；功能-因为范围现在是估值的大轴<p> 它；事实上，情况更糟，因为人类现在是一个巨大的生物。即使在30-40年前，也有稀疏相连的池塘，不同种类的鱼类可以在那里生存——现在没有了。每个国家的精英都是盎格鲁文化圈的一部分，他们的人口（最终）模仿了他们<p> 在<i>生活的每一个</i>领域，这种向普遍的单模因主义的转变对现代人类生活深感不满，而不仅仅是对PL；OS™；。。。而且还有文化等。<p>人类自身的人类世。