【Hacker News搬运】任天堂起诉Pocketpair公司侵犯专利权

hackernews

Title: Nintendo Files Suit for Infringement of Patent Rights Against Pocketpair, Inc

任天堂起诉Pocketpair公司侵犯专利权

Text:

Url: https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/release/en/2024/240919.html

很抱歉，我无法直接访问外部链接，包括您提供的Nintendo的链接。因此，我无法直接抓取和分析该网页的内容。

不过，如果您能提供网页的内容摘要或者需要我帮助分析的内容，我可以尝试帮您进行分析和总结。如果您需要帮助翻译非中文内容到中文，您可以提供该内容文本，我会尽力提供翻译服务。

Post by: monocasa

Comments:

JohnMakin: There can be no lawsuit here without upsetting the entire gaming industry. Sue star wars survivor series for being a blatant ripoff of sekiro but based in star wars - where do you draw the line? Games have copied mechanics for as long as there have been games.I have no faith in the courts, however, and nintendo usually wins these stupid things.

JohnMakin: 在不扰乱整个游戏行业的情况下，这里不可能有任何诉讼。起诉《星球大战幸存者》系列，因为它公然抄袭了千代，但以《星球大战》为背景——你该在哪里划清界限？自从有游戏以来，游戏就一直在复制机制 然而，我对法庭没有信心，任天堂通常会赢得这些愚蠢的事情。

ThrowawayR2: Note that it's for patents and not copyright (i.e. character likenesses), as many predicted.It'll be interesting to see which patents Nintendo is trying to assert. Given that Palworld is purely a game, it seems likely to be Nintendo's patents related to game mechanics (e.g. <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37062820">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37062820</a>), which I think most people here are justifiably against.

ThrowawayR2: 请注意；正如许多人所预测的那样，s代表专利，而不是版权（即人物肖像） 它；看看任天堂试图主张哪些专利，我会很感兴趣。鉴于Palworld纯粹是一款游戏，它似乎很可能是任天堂；我们的专利与游戏机制有关（例如<a href=“https:&#x2F；news.ycombinator.com/ item？id=37062820”>https:&quot；news.ymbinator.com&#x2F.item？id=37062820</a>），我认为这里的大多数人都有理由反对。

modeless: In response, Pocketpair has hired lawyers identical to Nintendo's, except with guns.<a href="https://hard-drive.net/hd/video-games/pocketpair-hires-identical-lawyers-with-guns/" rel="nofollow">https://hard-drive.net/hd/video-games/pocketpair-hires-ident...</a>

modeless: 作为回应，Pocketpair聘请了与任天堂相同的律师；s、除了枪 <a href=“https:&#x2F；&#x2G；hard-drive.net&#x2H；视频游戏&#x2A；pocketpair雇佣了持有枪支的完全相同的律师&#x2B；”rel=“nofollow”>https:&#x2F；硬盘驱动器.net；hd&#x2F；视频游戏；pocketpair雇佣身份证持有人</一

Willish42: For anybody who's wondering, Nintendo doesn't actually own Pokemon (a common misconception), but has a major stake in "The Pokemon Company", which does <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo#Subsidiaries" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo#Subsidiaries</a>As such, I wonder if this structure makes it harder to sue over IP infringement. I agree with others here that patent infringement is a seemingly odd pick, but perhaps this also has to do with character design patents, since Palworld didn't explicitly use Nintendo's IP?Should be interesting regardless to see what happens

Willish42: 对于那些；我想知道，任天堂没有；t实际上拥有口袋妖怪（一种常见的误解），但与&quot；口袋妖怪公司&quot；，<a href=“https:”en.wikipedia.org:”wiki:”Nintendo#子公司“rel=”nofollow“>https:”&#x2F；en.wikipedia.org；维基；任天堂#子公司</a>因此，我想知道这种结构是否会使起诉知识产权侵权变得更加困难。我同意这里的其他人的观点，专利侵权似乎是一个奇怪的选择，但也许这也与角色设计专利有关，因为Palworld没有；没有明确使用任天堂；s IP 不管发生什么，都应该很有趣

nfriedly: For those unaware, Pocketpair made the game Palworld, which has "pals" that look like Pokemon.

nfriedly: 对于那些不知情的人来说，Pocketpair制作了游戏《Palworld》；伙伴&quot；看起来像口袋妖怪。