【Hacker News搬运】砂光UI

[hackernews]

Title: Sanding UI

砂光UI

Text:

hn link

Url: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2024/sanding-ui/

很抱歉，由于我无法直接访问互联网或外部链接，包括您提供的博客链接，因此我无法直接抓取或分析该网页的内容。

不过，如果您能提供该网页的内容或关键信息，我可以帮您进行内容分析和总结。如果您需要帮助理解或翻译非中文内容，请提供该内容的英文或其它语言版本，我将尽力协助您将其翻译成中文并进行总结。

Post by: roosgit

Comments:

aetherspawn: This is so lost in Agile.<p>Engineers should get the time to “sand” their products, but we just don’t. If QA doesn’t make a ticket for the space between, it’ll never get fixed.<p>The customer probably notices this kind of a thing but it’s a miracle if the customer bothers to report it, and another miracle if it eventually turns into a ticket, and another miracle if someone prioritises it enough to spend time fixing it.<p>[In fact most companies have such opaque issue boards that as a customer I get so frustrated when I find a small issue or bug and have to spend like 50 hours back and forth to prove it’s a bug and actually get a ticket put in the tracker.]

aetherspawn: 这在敏捷中是如此的迷失<p> 工程师应该有时间“打磨”他们的产品，但我们就是没有。如果QA不为两者之间的间隔开罚单，它将永远无法修复<p> 客户可能会注意到这类事情，但如果客户费心报告，这是一个奇迹，如果它最终变成一张票，这是另一个奇迹；如果有人把它放在足够的优先级上，花时间修复它，这是又一个奇迹。<p>[事实上，大多数公司都有如此不透明的问题板，以至于作为客户，当我发现一个小问题或错误时，我会非常沮丧，不得不花大约50个小时来回证明这是个错误，并将一张票放在跟踪器中。]

xyst: I wonder what’s the most polished or “sanded” UI out there?<p>You would think FAANG would have a half decent UI and UX with the amount of money they have. But anybody that has used Amazon.com or AWS, GCP, or even Azure would beg to differ.<p>Personally, off the top of my head. The most polished UI/UX has to be “mcmaster.com”. I can find anything I need in what seems like a couple minutes.<p>Compare this to big box stores like “Home Depot”, “Lowe’s”. I can spend 10-15 minutes just trying to find the right size of screw, board, or whatever using their bloated sites. On mobile it’s even worse.

xyst: 我想知道最精致或“打磨”的UI是什么<p> 你会认为FAANG会有一个相当不错的用户界面和用户体验，与他们所拥有的资金相当。但任何使用过亚马逊、AWS、GCP甚至Azure的人都会持不同意见<p> 就我个人而言，从我的头顶上。最精致的UI；用户体验必须是“mcmaster.com”。我可以在几分钟内找到我需要的任何东西<p> 将其与“家得宝”、“劳氏”等大型超市进行比较。我可以花10-15分钟的时间，试着用他们臃肿的部位找到合适尺寸的螺丝、木板或其他任何东西。在移动设备上，情况甚至更糟。

ddtaylor: The goto tactic for this specific <label> problem is:<p><pre><code> <label>
Foo
<input>
</label></code></pre>

ddtaylor: 针对这一特定问题的“goto”策略；标签&gt；`问题是：<p><pre><code>&lt；标签&gt；Foo&lt；输入&gt；&lt&#x2F；标签&gt</代码></pre>

pentagrama: Is so important have people with that spark to see and fix those little UX issues, a good analogy used on UX design is papercuts for the user, not critical but it degrades user satisfaction.<p>To the author I will add that that radio button is not following the convension of a dot for the selected state instead of a check. Users may think at first sight that multiple/no selection is possible.

pentagrama: 让有这种火花的人看到并解决这些小的用户体验问题非常重要，在用户体验设计中使用的一个很好的类比是用户的剪纸，这并不重要，但会降低用户满意度<p> 对于作者，我将补充一点，该单选按钮不是按照所选状态的点而不是复选标记的约定。用户第一眼可能会认为；无法选择。

two_handfuls: Meanwhile, some other UI uses square boxes for radio buttons.<p>Or have a highlighted button but the enter key doesn't activate it.<p>Or there are three different menus all behind a different symbol (ellipsis, hamburger, kebab).<p>There is a lot of variance in quality. Those of you who polish your UI: you are appreciated. Truly.

two_handfuls: 与此同时，其他一些UI使用方形框作为单选按钮<p> 或者有一个突出显示的按钮，但输入键没有；t激活它。<p>或者有三个不同的菜单，都在一个不同的符号后面（省略号、汉堡包、烤肉串）<p> 质量差异很大。你们中那些润色UI的人：我们很感激你们。真的。