【Hacker News搬运】苹果收购Pixelmator

hackernews

Title: Apple acquires Pixelmator

苹果收购Pixelmator

Text:

Url: https://www.pixelmator.com/blog/2024/11/01/a-new-home-for-pixelmator/

很抱歉，作为一个AI，我无法直接访问或解析网页内容。因此，我无法使用JinaReader或其他工具来抓取和总结您提供的链接（https://www.pixelmator.com/blog/2024/11/01/a-new-home-for-pixelmator/）中的内容。

不过，我可以提供一个一般性的指导，如果您想要自己抓取和分析网页内容：

1. **抓取内容**：
   - 使用Python中的`requests`库来发送HTTP请求并获取网页内容。
   - 使用`BeautifulSoup`或`lxml`等库来解析HTML内容。

```python
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup

url = 'https://www.pixelmator.com/blog/2024/11/01/a-new-home-for-pixelmator/'
response = requests.get(url)
soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, 'html.parser')

分析内容：
- 根据需要提取特定的信息，如标题、段落、图片链接等。

# 提取标题
title = soup.find('h1').get_text()

# 提取所有段落
paragraphs = [p.get_text() for p in soup.find_all('p')]

# 提取图片链接
images = [img['src'] for img in soup.find_all('img')]

翻译非中文内容：
- 使用在线翻译API（如Google Translate API）来翻译提取的文本。

from googletrans import Translator

translator = Translator()
translated_title = translator.translate(title, dest='zh-cn').text
translated_paragraphs = [translator.translate(p, dest='zh-cn').text for p in paragraphs]

总结内容：
- 根据抓取和分析的结果，编写一个简短的总结。

请注意，以上代码仅为示例，实际应用中可能需要根据网页的具体结构和内容进行调整。如果网页内容包含敏感信息或需要遵守特定的抓取规则，请确保您的抓取行为符合相关法律法规和网站的使用条款。

        
## Post by: dm
        
### Comments: 
        
**thenberlin**: Putting concerns about future states aside, congrats to the Pixelmator team. I&#x27;ve been using the app for years and it&#x27;s a really great piece of software, well designed and well built. It&#x27;s always been incredible value for the price, especially given that it basically replaces Photoshop for a wide swath of the market without compromising on UX (which is a problem for other competitors) at a price point that&#x27;s like 1-2 months of an Adobe subscription (I don&#x27;t even know exactly what that costs any more because Pixelmator + parts of the Affinity suite got me out of their clutches).<p>Adobe must not be stoked about this news. And I&#x27;ll just keep my fingers crossed this all heads in a direction that&#x27;s more Logic than Dark Sky.
> **thenberlin**: 抛开对未来州的担忧，祝贺Pixelmator团队。我；我已经使用这个应用程序很多年了，它；这是一款非常棒的软件，设计精良，构建良好。它；s的价格总是令人难以置信的，特别是考虑到它基本上在很大一部分市场上取代了Photoshop，而不会在用户体验方面妥协（这对其他竞争对手来说是一个问题），价格点为；这就像Adobe订阅1-2个月（我甚至不知道还要花多少钱，因为Pixelmator+Affinity套件的一部分让我摆脱了他们的控制）<p> Adobe绝不能对这一消息感到兴奋。而我；我会一直祈祷这一切朝着一个方向发展；这比黑暗的天空更有逻辑。
            
**lynndotpy**: Is there any way this can go bad?<p>When Apple acquired DarkSky, they absolutely destroyed a service that I loved and relied on. Four years on, Apple Weather is less reliable than DarkSky, and not even close to feature complete.<p>But DarkSky was a cross-platform service, whereas Pixelmator is software that&#x27;s already Apple-only. I&#x27;m wondering how much I should be worried, and if I should already be abandoning ship.
> **lynndotpy**: 这有可能会变坏吗<p> 当苹果收购DarkSky时，他们彻底摧毁了我喜爱和依赖的一项服务。四年过去了，Apple Weather的可靠性不如DarkSky，甚至还没有接近功能完整<p> 但DarkSky是一项跨平台服务，而Pixelmator是一款；现在只有苹果了。我；我想知道我应该担心多少，我是否已经弃船了。
            
**bangaroo**: apple&#x27;s pro apps have been in a weird space for a while. aperture dying was a bummer, and final cut and logic feel simultaneously actively developed and abandoned to me, there&#x27;s just not much buzz around them.<p>it would be very neat if apple started to build the necessary portfolio of software to provide a viable, ideally not-subscription-based competitor to adobe&#x27;s suite of products. they certainly have had the chops to be competitive in the creative space for a long time, so it feels like something they&#x27;d be well-positioned to seriously take on if they invested heavily in it.<p>i haven&#x27;t been as in touch with the video editing space as i was 2 decades ago when i worked in TV, but it feels like FCP is not the juggernaut it once was from the outside. my read may be wrong. similarly, logic doesn&#x27;t feel as prominent in the music world anymore - i really rarely see musicians using it these days, though again that may just be my bias in the kinds of folks i pay attention to. would be cool to see the apple pro suite really regain its mojo and shake things up.
> **bangaroo**: 苹果；s的专业应用程序已经处于一个奇怪的领域有一段时间了。光圈消亡是一件令人沮丧的事情，最终的剪辑和逻辑感同时被积极地发展和抛弃，在那里；只是他们周围没什么热闹<p> 如果苹果开始构建必要的软件组合，为adobe提供一个可行的、理想情况下不是基于订阅的竞争对手，那将是非常棒的；我们的产品系列。长期以来，他们当然有能力在创意领域保持竞争力，所以这感觉就像他们；如果他们在这方面投入了大量资金，我完全有能力认真对待；我不像20年前在电视行业工作时那样接触视频编辑领域，但感觉FCP已经不像以前那样强大了。我的阅读可能有误。类似地，逻辑不会；我觉得自己在音乐界已经不再那么突出了——这些天我真的很少看到音乐家使用它，尽管这可能只是我对我所关注的人的偏见。如果看到苹果专业套件真的重新获得魔力并改变现状，那就太酷了。
            
**toinbis**: Well done team Lithuania! Remember hearing Pixelmator founders giving a speech ~12 years ago. They were very vocal and repeated this many times: &quot;Our marketing strategy is to just focus on the product&quot;. Not sure I agree with that statement, but they sure seem to followed it thoroughly. Congrats on the acquisition!
> **toinbis**: 立陶宛队干得好！记得12年前听Pixelmator创始人的演讲吗。他们非常直言不讳，并多次重复：&quot；我们的营销战略是只注重产品&quot；。我不确定我是否同意这一说法，但他们似乎完全遵循了这一说法。恭喜收购！
            
**lowkey_**: I&#x27;d never heard of Pixelmator before (congrats to them on the exit), and:<p>WOW their website already looks like an Apple website. The colors, the font, the logo with the same colors as Apple Photos, all the images that show a Mac window, the shade of red in the top right, the &quot;machine learning&quot; section that almost looks like Notes, and I scrolled down and it&#x27;s all about how great Mac is.<p>It seemed inevitable that Apple would either acquire or copy them, with how much this already looks like an Apple product, and is exclusively made for Mac apparently.
> **lowkey_**: 我；我以前从未听说过Pixelmator（在出口处向他们表示祝贺），而且：哇，他们的网站已经看起来像苹果网站了。颜色、字体、与Apple Photos颜色相同的徽标、显示Mac窗口的所有图像、右上角的红色阴影、&quot；机器学习”；部分几乎看起来像Notes，我向下滚动，它；这完全取决于Mac有多棒。<p>苹果似乎不可避免地会收购或复制它们，因为这看起来已经很像苹果的产品，而且显然是专门为Mac制造的。