【Hacker News搬运】稳定性AI：Emad Mostaque辞去首席执行官职务

[hackernews]

Title: Stability AI: Emad Mostaque resigned from his role as CEO

稳定性AI：Emad Mostaque辞去首席执行官职务

Text:

hn link

Url: https://stability.ai/news/stabilityai-announcement

标题：Stability AI 公告 — Stability AI
作者：23 Mar
            
            作者：Bryce Wilson
发布日期：未提供
顶部图片链接：未提供
文本：


今天早些时候，Emad Mostaque辞去了Stability AI首席执行官的职务以及公司董事会董事的职务，以追求去中心化AI。董事会任命了我们的首席运营官Shan Shan Wong和首席技术官Christian Laforte作为Stability AI的临时联合首席执行官。我们正在积极寻找一名永久首席执行官，以建立在Stability AI的基础上，并领导公司进入下一阶段的增长。

“我代表董事会，感谢Emad对Stability AI和开源运动的领导力和不懈承诺，”Stability AI董事会主席Jim O’Shaughnessy说。“在我们寻找永久首席执行官的同时，我完全相信Shan Shan Wong和Christian Laforte作为临时联合首席执行官，将熟练地指导公司向前发展，开发和商业化行业领先的生成AI产品。他们互补的技能和经验使他们非常适合这个角色，让我们对未来和从这一时期 emerged 作为一家更强大的公司充满信心。”

“我很自豪，在带来我们的第一位开发者两年后，我领导Stability走到了数亿次下载和跨模态最佳模型。我坚信Stability AI的使命，并认为公司处于有能力的人手中。现在是要确保AI保持开放和去中心化的时候了，”Emad Mostaque说。

这次领导变革标志着Stability AI、管理团队、董事会和投资者在共同致力于实现公司下一阶段增长的全局愿景的机会。我们一起承诺保护这支杰出的团队、尖端技术和多年来培育的充满活力的社区，确保Stability AI在开源多模态生成AI领域保持领导地位。

Post by: ed

Comments:

Satam: The underlying reason is that current AI businesses and models are failing to capture any significant economic value. We're going to get there, but it will take some more work. It won't be decades, but a few more years would be helpful

Satam: 根本原因是当前的人工智能业务和模型未能获得任何重大的经济价值。我们；我们会到达那里，但还需要更多的工作；不需要几十年，但再过几年会有所帮助

ec109685: Previous controversy involving the CEO (2023): <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/2023/06/04/stable-diffusion-emad-mostaque-stability-ai-exaggeration/" rel="nofollow">https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/2023/06/04/stable-di...</a><p>“ In reality, Mostaque has a bachelor’s degree, not a master’s degree from Oxford. The hedge fund’s banner year was followed by one so poor that it shut down months later. The U.N. hasn’t worked with him for years. And while Stable Diffusion was the main reason for his own startup Stability AI’s ascent to prominence, its source code was written by a different group of researchers. “Stability, as far as I know, did not even know about this thing when we created it,” Björn Ommer, the professor who led the research, told Forbes. “They jumped on this wagon only later on.” “<p>“ “What he is good at is taking other people’s work and putting his name on it, or doing stuff that you can’t check if it’s true.”

ec109685: 之前涉及首席执行官的争议（2023年）：<a href=“https:&#x2F；&#x20F；www.forbes.com&#x2F！sites&#x20F！kenrickcai&#x2F？2023&#x2F：06&#x2F，04&#x2F。稳定扩散emad mostaque稳定性ai夸大&#x2F”rel=“nofollow”>https:&#x20F&#x2F；www.forbes.com&#x2F；站点；kenrickcai；2023；06；04；稳定的di</a> <p>“事实上，莫斯塔克拥有牛津大学的学士学位，而不是硕士学位。这家对冲基金在辉煌的一年之后，又经历了一个非常糟糕的一年，几个月后就倒闭了。联合国已经多年没有与他合作了。虽然稳定扩散是他自己的初创公司稳定人工智能脱颖而出的主要原因，但它的源代码是由另一组研究人员编写的。”领导这项研究的教授比约恩·奥默告诉《福布斯》。“他们后来才跳上这辆马车。”“<p>”“他擅长的是接受别人的工作并把自己的名字写在上面，或者做一些你无法核实是否属实的事情。”

minimaxir: He's leaving to work on <i>decentralized</i> AI? That's exactly what Stability AI was doing before it became clear the economics no longer work out in practice, and starting a new company wouldn't change that. (Emad is an advisory board member to a decentralized GPU company, though: <a href="https://home.otoy.com/stabilityai/" rel="nofollow">https://home.otoy.com/stabilityai/</a> )<p>Obviously this is the polite way to send him off given the latest news about his leadership, but this rationale doesn't track.

minimaxir: 他；It’s leave to work on<i>去中心化</i>人工智能？那个；这正是Stability AI在经济学在实践中不再奏效之前所做的事情，创办一家新公司将；不要改变这一点。（Emad是一家去中心化GPU公司的顾问委员会成员，不过：<a href=“https://；&#x2F；home.otoy.com&#x2F，stabilityai&#x2F”rel=“nofollow”>https://；home.otoy.com&#x20F；stabilityai&#x2F）</a>显然，鉴于他领导能力的最新消息，这是礼貌的送别方式，但这种理由并不适用；t轨迹。

stale2002: Well RIP Stability AI.<p>I love their models and I love how they have changed the entire open source AI ecosystem for the better, but the writing was always on the wall for them given how unprofitable they are.<p>I don't think much of the AI startup scene or socials groups like e/acc would have existed if it weren't for the tech that they just gave away for free.<p>Its interesting how Stability AI and their VC funding have done a much better job of acting effectively as a non-profit charity (because they don't have profits. lol) to speed up AI development and open source their results as compared to other companies that were supposed to have been doing that from the beginning.<p>They really were the true ActuallyOpenAI.<p>Related to this, if you are an aspiring person who wants to improve the world, tricking a bunch of VC investors to fund your tech and then giving away the results to everyone free of charge is the single best way to do it.

stale2002: RIP Stability AI。<p>我喜欢他们的模型，我喜欢他们如何将整个开源AI生态系统变得更好，但考虑到他们是多么无利可图，他们的写作总是挂在墙上<p> 我不；我不太看好人工智能创业场景或像e&F这样的社交团体；如果不是，acc就会存在；他们刚刚免费赠送的技术<p> 有趣的是，与其他从一开始就应该这样做的公司相比，Stability AI及其风险投资作为一家非营利慈善机构（因为他们没有利润。哈哈）在加快人工智能开发和开源方面做得更好<p> 他们真的是真正的开放人工智能<p> 与此相关的是，如果你是一个有抱负的人，想改善世界，那么欺骗一群风险投资家为你的技术提供资金，然后将结果免费赠送给每个人是最好的方法。

rvz: Looks like many AI startups are experiencing a bit of some turbulence and chaos in the recent months:<p>First the OpenAI rebellion in November, then the Inflection AI acqui-hire from Microsoft not willing to pay the over-valued $4B and deflected that to $600M instead (after making $0 revenue) and now a bit of in-stability at Stability AI with the CEO resigning after many employees leaving.<p>What does that say about the other AI companies out there who have raised tons of VC cash and aren't making any meaningful amount of revenue? I guess that is contributing to the collapse of this bubble with only a very few companies surviving.

rvz: 最近几个月，许多人工智能初创公司似乎都经历了一些动荡和混乱：<p>首先是11月的OpenAI叛乱，然后是微软的Inflection AI默许员工不愿意支付过高的40亿美元，转而将其转移到6亿美元（在获得0美元收入后），现在稳定人工智能有点稳定，许多员工离职后首席执行官辞职<p> 这说明了其他人工智能公司如何筹集了大量VC资金；没有任何有意义的收入吗？我想这是导致泡沫破裂的原因，只有极少数公司幸存下来。