【Hacker News搬运】谷歌下令确定谁观看了某些YouTube视频

hackernews

Title: Google Ordered to Identify Who Watched Certain YouTube Videos

谷歌下令确定谁观看了某些YouTube视频

Text:

Url: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2024/03/22/feds-ordered-google-to-unmask-certain-youtube-users-critics-say-its-terrifying/

很抱歉，由于连接超时，我无法使用 webscraper 工具抓取指定 URL 的内容。请确保网站是可以访问的，并且尝试重新提交请求。如果您有其他 URL 或需要进一步的帮助，请告诉我。

Post by: wut42

Comments:

Animats: "In conversations with the user in early January, undercover agents sent links of YouTube tutorials for mapping via drones and augmented reality software, then asked Google for information on who had viewed the videos, which collectively have been watched over 30,000 times."Huh? Why? Is this because some country doesn't like people having good mapping technology? Israel and China object to precision mapping, but the US historically has not.

Animats: ”；在1月初与该用户的对话中，卧底特工通过无人机和增强现实软件发送了YouTube地图教程的链接，然后向谷歌询问谁观看了这些视频的信息，这些视频总共被观看了30000多次&quot 嗯？为什么？这是因为有些国家不；你不喜欢人们有好的地图技术吗？以色列和中国反对精确测绘，但美国历来不反对。

addicted: There are different incidents here.The first one where the police uploaded videos and wanted viewer information is absolutely egregious and makes me wonder how a court could authorize that.The next one, which I didn’t fully understand, but appeared to be in response to a swatting incident where the culprit is believed to have watched a specific camera livestream and the police provided a lot of narrowing details (time period, certain other characteristics, etc) appears far more legitimate.

addicted: 这里有不同的事件 第一次警方上传视频并通缉观众信息的行为绝对令人震惊，这让我想知道法院怎么会授权这样做 下一个我不完全理解，但似乎是对一起殴打事件的回应，据信罪犯观看了特定的摄像机直播，警方提供了许多缩小范围的细节（时间段、某些其他特征等），这似乎更合法。

tamimio: > The court orders show the government telling Google to provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos..Hopefully that clarifies for some folks why these big tech/social media companies insist on having your phone number as a “2FA for security” despite all the sim-swap attacks.. simply for this moment, because you might be using a VPN, and address/name aren’t in your google account, but definitely your phone number is there, it’s even worse if you’re using an android too, as they probably will pull out all your app/browsing history..

tamimio: &gt；法庭命令显示，政府要求谷歌提供所有访问YouTube视频的谷歌账户用户的姓名、地址、电话号码和用户活动 希望这能为一些人澄清为什么这些大型科技公司；社交媒体公司坚持将你的电话号码作为“安全2FA”，尽管有所有的sim卡交换攻击。。只是为了这个时刻，因为你可能正在使用VPN，并且地址为；名字不在你的谷歌账户中，但你的电话号码肯定在那里，如果你也在使用安卓系统，情况会更糟，因为他们可能会拿出你所有的应用程序；浏览历史记录。。

WillieCubed: > The court orders show the government telling Google to provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos between January 1 and January 8, 2023.Interesting aside: Viacom used a similar broad request back in 2008 [1] in its lawsuit that nearly put YouTube out of business in its infancy. This time, it's the government making the request, and Google has way more data to potentially provide.[1]: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20100702111029/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gvFPgT3MNrzaN7r-Y37eFI-qv4bA" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20100702111029/http://afp.google...</a>

WillieCubed: &gt；法庭命令显示，政府要求谷歌提供所有在2023年1月1日至1月8日期间访问YouTube视频的谷歌账户用户的姓名、地址、电话号码和用户活动。有趣的是：维亚康姆早在2008年[1]的诉讼中就提出了类似的广泛要求，这几乎使YouTube在其起步阶段就倒闭了。这一次；这是政府提出的要求，谷歌有更多的数据可以提供 [1]：<a href=“https:&#x2F；[x2F；web.archive.org&#x20F；web&#x2000702111029&#x20f；http:&#x2F；&#x2F，afp.google.com&#x20F，article&#x2F：ALeqM5gvFPgT3MNrzaN7r-Y37eFI-qv4bA”rel=“nofollow”>https:&#x20F&#x2F；web.archive.org&#x2F；web；20100702111029；http:&#x2F&#x2F；afp.google</一

nonethewiser: Im increasingly coming to the opinion that anonymity isnt guaranteed so you should assume everyone knows what you do.m and who you are. So you should probably just use your real name and do way less online.Havent fully swallowed this pill but its feeling inevitable.

nonethewiser: 我越来越认为匿名是不能保证的，所以你应该假设每个人都知道你在做什么，知道你是谁。所以你可能应该只使用你的真名，少在网上做一些事情 虽然还没有完全吞下这种药丸，但它的感觉是不可避免的。