【Hacker News搬运】特鲁多政府禁止TikTok在加拿大运营
-
Title: Trudeau government bans TikTok from operating in Canada
特鲁多政府禁止TikTok在加拿大运营
Text:
Url: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tiktok-canada-review-1.7375965
很抱歉,作为一个AI,我无法直接访问或处理互联网上的内容。因此,我无法使用JinaReader或其他工具来抓取和分析您提供的CBC新闻链接内容。 不过,我可以告诉您如何使用JinaReader或类似工具来抓取和分析内容的一般步骤: 1. **安装JinaReader**:首先,您需要在您的计算机上安装JinaReader。这通常涉及到下载安装包并按照说明进行安装。 2. **配置JinaReader**:配置JinaReader以适应您的需求。这可能包括设置数据源、配置处理管道和定义输出格式。 3. **抓取内容**:使用JinaReader从指定的URL(如您提供的CBC新闻链接)抓取内容。 4. **处理和翻译**:如果抓取的内容不是中文,您可以使用内置或外部翻译服务将内容翻译成中文。 5. **分析内容**:使用JinaReader的NLP功能对内容进行分析。这可能包括关键词提取、情感分析、主题建模等。 6. **总结内容**:根据分析结果,生成内容的摘要或总结。 以下是一个使用JinaReader进行内容抓取、翻译和分析的伪代码示例: ```python # 伪代码,非实际可运行的代码 # 配置JinaReader jina_reader = configure_jina_reader(source_url="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tiktok-canada-review-1.7375965") # 抓取内容 content = jina_reader.fetch_content() # 如果内容不是中文,翻译成中文 if not is_chinese(content): content = translate_to_chinese(content) # 分析内容 analysis_results = jina_reader.analyze_content(content) # 总结内容 summary = jina_reader.summarize_content(analysis_results) # 输出总结 print(summary)
请注意,上述代码是概念性的,并不是真正的代码,因为JinaReader和它的API可能与此不同。如果您想要实际使用JinaReader,您需要查阅它的官方文档来了解如何正确配置和使用它。
## Post by: empressplay ### Comments: **not2b**: Instead of the laser focus on TikTok as a threat, it would be better for the US and Canada to have real data protection laws that would apply equally to TikTok, Meta, Google, Apple, and X. What the EU has done is far from perfect but it bans the worst practices. The Chinese can buy all of the information they want on Americans and Canadians from ad brokers, who will happily sell them everything they need to track individuals' locations.<p>Perhaps the way to get anti-regulation politicians on board with this is for someone to do what was done to Robert Bork and legally disclose lots of personal info on members of Congress/Parliament, obtained from data brokers and de-anonymized. > **not2b**: 与其将TikTok视为威胁,美国和加拿大最好制定真正的数据保护法,平等适用于TikTok、Meta、谷歌、苹果和X。欧盟所做的工作远非完美,但它禁止最坏的做法。中国人可以从广告经纪人那里购买他们想要的关于美国人和加拿大人的所有信息,广告经纪人会很乐意向他们出售追踪个人所需的一切;地点<p> 也许让反监管政客参与其中的方法是让某人做对罗伯特·博克所做的事情,并合法披露国会议员的大量个人信息;议会,从数据代理处获得并匿名。 **latchkey**: Not a single mention of the "Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act"?<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Foreign_Adversary_Controlled_Applications_Act" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Fore...</a><p>Interesting timing on that one...<p>"Your starting date is April 24, 2024 so that means that 270 days later would be January 19, 2025." > **latchkey**: 只字未提";《保护美国人免受外国对手控制申请法》<p> <a href=“https:/;en.wikipedia.org/-wiki/ Protecting_American_from_Foreign_Adversary_Controlled_Applications_Act”rel=“nofollow”>https:/;en.wikipedia.org;维基;保护_美国_更多</a> <p>这个时间点很有趣<p> ";你的开始日期是2024年4月24日,这意味着270天后就是2025年1月19日。"; **joshdavham**: > "Most people can say, 'Why is it a big deal for a teenager now to have their data [on TikTok]?' Well in five years, in 10 years, that teenager will be a young adult, will be engaged in different activities around the world,"<p>I’m technically Gen-Z (but just barely) and this is something that really worries me. It’s become increasingly normal in recent times to share absolutely everything online but I’ve got a pretty grim feeling that this isn’t gonna end well. People don’t realize that the AI’s being trained on your data today will act as an internet history that you can never delete. > **joshdavham**: >&“;大多数人会说:;为什么现在一个青少年在TikTok上拥有自己的数据是一件大事';五年后,十年后,这个少年将成为一个年轻的成年人,将在世界各地从事不同的活动。"<p> 从技术上讲,我是Z世代(但只是勉强如此),这真的让我很担心。最近在网上分享一切变得越来越正常,但我有一种非常严峻的感觉,这不会有好的结局。人们没有意识到,今天在你的数据上训练的人工智能将成为你永远无法删除的互联网历史。 **ttul**: I believe there is a legal concept at play here. If a company has an office - a physical presence - within the country, then it has what is called “mind and management” in the country. The mind and management doctrine gives the company certain rights within Canada that presumably the security folks don’t want them to have.<p>The public will probably never find out the scope of ByteDance’s operations in Canada for the Chinese government, but if it follows the same arc as other Chinese operations in Canada, I expect it is far more pervasive and frightening than one might expect. This isn’t about the app. This is about the offices. > **ttul**: 我认为这里有一个法律概念在起作用。如果一家公司在国内有一个办事处——一个实体存在,那么它在国内就有所谓的“思想和管理”。思想和管理原则赋予公司在加拿大境内的某些权利,这些权利可能是安全人员不希望他们拥有的<p> 公众可能永远不会为中国政府了解字节跳动在加拿大的业务范围,但如果它与中国在加拿大的其他业务一样,我预计它会比人们想象的更普遍、更可怕。这与应用程序无关。这是关于办公室的。 **strongpigeon**: To be clear, they're not banning the app, they're banning ByteDance from having offices in Canada > **strongpigeon**: 需要明确的是,它们;他们没有禁止该应用程序,他们;禁止字节跳动在加拿大设立办事处