【Hacker News搬运】将自己公开为HTTP/SOCKS5代理的WireGuard客户端

hackernews

Title: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy

将自己公开为HTTP/SOCKS5代理的WireGuard客户端

Text:

Url: https://github.com/pufferffish/wireproxy

很抱歉，但在尝试使用 webscraper 工具抓取指定 URL 的内容时，我们遇到了一个技术问题，连接被远程端关闭了，这导致无法获取和分析网页内容。作为一个替代方案，我可以提供一些关于 GitHub 仓库的一般信息，或者指导您如何手动访问该页面以获取所需信息。如果您需要进一步的帮助，请告诉我。

Post by: JNRowe

Comments:

lxgr: Great little tool!<p>I use it to selectively proxy Firefox tabs using multi-account containers to a home router that speaks Wireguard (but no application-layer proxying protocol or SSH).

lxgr: 很棒的小工具<p> 我使用它来选择性地将使用多帐户容器的Firefox选项卡代理到使用Wireguard的家庭路由器（但没有应用层代理协议或SSH）。

poorman: Nice! I was just thinking it would be sweet to have something like this to proxy all my Thunderbird email connections through my Tailscale exit node, without having to direct all my traffic through the exit node.

poorman: 美好的我只是觉得有这样的东西通过Tailscale出口节点代理我所有的Thunderbird电子邮件连接会很好，而不必通过出口节点引导我所有的流量。

vbezhenar: Is there completely userspace server implementation? Without tun/tap devices, etc. I guess some kind of userspace IP stack is necessary for that, although not sure.

vbezhenar: 是否有完全的用户空间服务器实现？没有tun；tap设备等。我想某种用户空间IP堆栈是必要的，尽管不确定。

yjftsjthsd-h: How's the performance? My memory is that "vanilla" SOCKS is really easy to do (just run ssh with the right option and tell your application to use it) but really slow. I suspect this is mostly for cases where you don't <i>have</i> a normal SOCKS/ssh server, but I'm curious if it offers a benefit there too.

yjftsjthsd-h: 如何；表演怎么样？我的记忆是&quot；香草”；SOCKS确实很容易做到（只需使用正确的选项运行ssh并告诉您的应用程序使用它），但速度非常慢。我怀疑这主要是针对你没有；t＜i＞具有</i＞正常SOCKS；ssh服务器，但我；我很好奇它是否也有好处。

hairyplanter: I was thinking “hey, I bet it would be pretty easy to write something like this in Go”. And of course it’s written in Go!

hairyplanter: 我在想“嘿，我打赌在围棋中写这样的东西会很容易”。当然它是用Go写的！