【Hacker News搬运】GitHub与谷歌、Anthropic达成人工智能协议

[hackernews]

Title: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic

GitHub与谷歌、Anthropic达成人工智能协议

Text:

hn link

Url: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-29/microsoft-s-github-unit-cuts-ai-deals-with-google-anthropic

由于我是一个AI，我无法直接访问外部网站或实时内容。但是，我可以根据你提供的链接和标题来模拟一个可能的总结。

标题：微软的GitHub部门与谷歌和Anthropic达成AI交易

可能的总结：
微软的GitHub部门最近宣布与谷歌和AI公司Anthropic达成了多项AI合作协议。这些交易标志着微软在扩展其AI服务和支持方面迈出了重要一步。具体来说，微软将通过这些合作：

1. 加强其GitHub平台上的AI工具和功能，为开发者提供更多的AI资源。
2. 与谷歌和Anthropic合作，整合先进的人工智能技术，以提升GitHub服务的性能和效率。
3. 探索人工智能在教育、研究和其他领域的应用，共同推动技术发展。

这些合作可能会对整个技术行业产生深远影响，尤其是在促进开源项目和AI技术的融合方面。通过这些合作，微软、谷歌和Anthropic有望共同开发出更加强大和易于使用的AI工具，从而加速人工智能技术的普及和应用。

请注意，以上内容是基于标题的假设性总结，具体细节和内容可能有所不同。要获取准确的信息，请直接访问提供的链接。

Post by: jbredeche

Comments:

altbdoor: <a href="https://archive.is/Il4QM" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/Il4QM</a>

altbdoor: <a href=“https:存档.is Il4QM”rel=“nofollow”>https:&#x2F；archive.is；Il4QM</a>

thih9: I use cursor and its tab completion; while what it can do is mind blowing, in practice I’m not noticing a productivity boost.<p>I find that ai can help significantly with doing plumbing, but it has no problems with connecting the pipes wrong. I need to double and triple check the updated code - or fix the resulting errors when I don’t do that. So: boilerplate and outer app layers, yes; architecture and core libraries, no.<p>Curious, is that a property of all ai assisted tools for now? Or would copilot, perhaps with its new models, offer a different experience?

thih9: 我使用游标及其制表符完成；虽然它能让人大吃一惊，但在实践中，我并没有注意到生产力的提高<p> 我发现人工智能在管道安装方面可以提供很大的帮助，但它不会出现管道连接错误的问题。我需要对更新的代码进行双重和三重检查，或者在不这样做的时候修复由此产生的错误。所以：样板和外部应用层，是的；架构和核心库，没有。<p>奇怪的是，目前这是所有人工智能辅助工具的属性吗？或者，副驾驶，也许是新车型，会提供不同的体验吗？

AIorNot: Reviewing these conversations is like listening to horse and buggy manufacturers pooh-poohing automobiles:<p>1. they will scare the horses. a good team of horses is no match for funky 'automobile'<p>2. how will they be able to deal with our muddy, messy roads<p>3. their engines are unreliable and prone to breaking down
stranding you in the middle and having to do it yourself..<p>4. their drivers cant handle the speed, too many miles driven means unsafe driving.. we should stick to horses they are manageable.<p>Meanwhile I'm watching a community of mostly young people building and using tools like copilot, cursor, replit, jacob etc and wiring up LLMs into increasingly more complex workflows.<p>this is snapshot of the current state, not a reflection of the future- Give it 10 years

AIorNot: 回顾这些对话就像听马车制造商对汽车嗤之以鼻：<p>1。他们会吓到马的。一个好的马队不是时髦的对手；汽车<p> 2。他们将如何应对我们泥泞、凌乱的道路。他们的发动机不可靠，容易出故障把你困在中间，不得不自己去做<p> 4。他们的司机无法控制速度，开太多英里意味着不安全的驾驶。。我们应该坚持用马——它们是可控的<p> 与此同时，我；我看着一个主要由年轻人组成的社区构建和使用副驾驶、光标、replit、jacob等工具，并将LLM连接到越来越复杂的工作流程中<p> 这是当前状态的快照，而不是未来的反映——给它10年时间

campbel: This is pretty exciting. I'm a copilot user at work, but also have access to Claude. I'm more inclined to use Claude for difficult coding problems or to review my work as I've just grown more confident in its abilities over the last several months.

campbel: 这太令人兴奋了。我；我在工作中是副驾驶用户，但也可以访问克劳德。我；我更倾向于使用Claude来解决困难的编码问题，或者在我工作时回顾我的工作；在过去的几个月里，我对它的能力越来越有信心。

thenobsta: I wonder what the rationale for this was internally. More OpenAI issues? competitiveness with Cursor? It seems good for the user to increase competition across LLM providers.<p>Also ambiguous title. I thought GitHub canceled deals they had in the work. The article is clearly about making a deal, but it's unclear from the article's title.

thenobsta: 我想知道这背后的内在逻辑是什么。更多OpenAI问题？与Cursor竞争？对用户来说，增加LLM提供商之间的竞争似乎是件好事<p> 标题也不明确。我以为GitHub取消了他们在工作中的交易。这篇文章显然是关于达成交易的，但它；从文章中看不清楚；的标题。