【Hacker News搬运】谷歌正在让Gmail和Docs中的人工智能免费，但提高了工作空间的价格
-
Title: Google is making AI in Gmail and Docs free, but raising the price of Workspace
谷歌正在让Gmail和Docs中的人工智能免费，但提高了工作空间的价格
Text:
Url: https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/15/24343794/google-workspace-ai-features-free
由于我是一个AI，我无法直接访问互联网来抓取内容。但是，我可以根据您提供的链接和描述来模拟这个过程。 假设链接指向的是一篇关于Google Workspace即将推出的AI功能的文章，以下是我会如何处理这个过程： 1. **抓取内容**： - 使用网络爬虫技术，如Scrapy或BeautifulSoup，从指定的URL中提取HTML内容。 - 清洗HTML内容，移除不必要的标签和脚本，保留文章的正文。 2. **翻译非中文内容**： - 如果文章包含非中文内容，可以使用翻译API（如Google Translate API）将文章翻译成中文。 3. **分析内容**： - 使用自然语言处理（NLP）技术，如文本摘要、关键词提取等，来分析文章的主要内容。 4. **总结**： - 根据分析结果，撰写一个简短的总结，概述文章的主要观点和发现。 以下是一个简化的模拟过程，假设我们已经完成了上述步骤： ```python # 模拟抓取内容 content = """ Google Workspace is set to receive a major update with new AI features. The update will include advanced document editing tools, smart scheduling, and a new AI-powered search feature. Users will be able to edit documents with suggestions and corrections provided by AI, schedule meetings more efficiently, and find information within their Workspace more quickly. """ # 模拟翻译非中文内容（假设所有内容都是英文） translated_content = content # 这里我们假设翻译API已经将内容翻译成中文 # 模拟分析内容 def summarize_content(text): # 简化版的摘要函数，实际中可能需要更复杂的NLP模型 sentences = text.split('. ') summary = '. '.join(sentences[:3]) + '.' return summary # 模拟总结 summary = summarize_content(translated_content) print(summary)输出可能是这样的：
Google Workspace is set to receive a major update with new AI features. The update will include advanced document editing tools, smart scheduling, and a new AI-powered search feature.请注意，这只是一个模拟过程，实际的抓取、翻译和分析会涉及到更复杂的代码和API调用。
## Post by: lars_francke ### Comments: **the_snooze**: >Workspace AI includes things like email summaries in Gmail, generated designs for spreadsheets and videos, an automated note-taker for meetings, the powerful NotebookLM research assistant, and writing tools across apps.<p>Maybe I'm just an old curmudgeon stuck in my ways, but I haven't found much compelling value in these use cases in my day-to-day work. For summaries and note-taking specifically, I feel they're solving the wrong problem: it's not that I have all this information that I really want to go through, but it's that I have too much information and it's become all noise.<p>The real solution to too much email is fewer and higher-priority emails. The real solution to too many meetings is fewer and more-focused meetings. These tools paper over the root cause of the problem, which is that people/organizations cannot (or are unwilling to) be clear about communication priorities and say "maybe this email/meeting isn't a good use of time after all." > **the_snooze**: >；工作空间AI包括Gmail中的电子邮件摘要、电子表格和视频的生成设计、会议的自动记笔记器、强大的NotebookLM研究助理以及跨应用程序的写作工具<p> 也许我；我只是一个固执己见的老脾气暴躁的人，但我没有；在我的日常工作中，我没有在这些用例中发现太多引人注目的价值；重新解决错误的问题：；这并不是说我有所有我真正想了解的信息，而是；因为我有太多的信息，而且；s变成了噪音<p> 解决电子邮件过多的真正办法是减少电子邮件数量，提高电子邮件优先级。会议过多的真正解决方案是减少会议次数，提高会议重点。这些工具掩盖了问题的根本原因，即人们；组织不能（或不愿意）明确沟通的优先事项，并说"；也许这封电子邮件；会议不是；毕竟这不是很好地利用时间&“； **Yawrehto**: I don't like AI being used in anything remotely creative.<p>I don't draw, not well, but I write, slightly better. I occasionally ask WordPress to have its AI generate a little blurb for me, and always wind up deleting it. It takes something I can't really describe, my voice I guess, and sucks it out. It homogenizes my writing to try to make it fit some bland ideal. I imagine to those more keen on art than I, AI art is similarly off.<p>And yes, stories are not the primary use of Gmail. But in business, words matter, and two seemingly synonymous words can be quite different, and two words that seem opposite may not be. I have a friend who teaches law, and they mentioned it was quite easy to tell which students cheated on one particular assignment discussing contracts. If I recall right, material contracts are a type of contract, and AI made up immaterial contracts.<p>While this mistake would hopefully be obvious, other mixups might not be, with potentially serious consequences. > **Yawrehto**: 我不知道；我不喜欢人工智能被用于任何有创意的事情<p> 我不知道；我画得不好，但我写得稍微好一点。我偶尔会要求WordPress让它的AI为我生成一个小广告，但最终总是删除它；我猜，我的声音真的很难形容，我把它吸了出来。它使我的写作同质化，试图使其符合一些平淡的理想。我想，对于那些比我更热衷于艺术的人来说，人工智能艺术同样不受欢迎。<p>是的，故事并不是Gmail的主要用途。但在商业中，单词很重要，两个看似同义的单词可能完全不同，两个看起来相反的单词可能不是。我有一个教法律的朋友，他们提到很容易分辨出哪些学生在讨论合同的一项特定任务中作弊。如果我没记错的话，实质性合同是一种合同，人工智能是由非实质性合同组成的<p> 虽然这个错误希望是显而易见的，但其他混淆可能不是，可能会产生严重的后果。 **jakedata**: We are doing a Gemini POC and this nugget dropped in my lap today. We were not entirely unprepared as a result. The default level of access is just the interactive chatbot thing. However if you enable the Google Workspace extension it will be able to search and process all the information stored in your workspace account and also any Google Drive files that are shared with you. This includes stuff you didn't know you had access to in Shared Drives so folks better make sure their permissions are locked down. Workspace admins might be advised to turn it off at the org level until they understand the ramifications. > **jakedata**: 我们正在进行双子座POC，今天这块金块掉在了我的腿上。因此，我们并非完全没有准备。默认的访问级别只是交互式聊天机器人。但是，如果您启用Google Workspace扩展，它将能够搜索和处理存储在您的工作区帐户中的所有信息，以及与您共享的任何Google Drive文件。这包括你没有的东西；我不知道你在共享驱动器中有访问权限，所以人们最好确保他们的权限被锁定。工作区管理员可能会被建议在组织层面关闭它，直到他们理解其后果。 **sirsinsalot**: I saw a Google AI advert that said:<p>"Hey Gemini, write an apology email for my friend. I can't make their wedding."<p>That's not a future I want to live in, and I love making machines work for me.<p>Thats not what I want my children to think is OK.<p>A friend of mine is a teacher and kids are already delegating their learning to ChatGPT and their learning isn't sticking.<p>What happens when social skills are delegated too? > **sirsinsalot**: 我看到一则谷歌人工智能广告，上面写着：<p>；嘿，双子座，给我朋友写封道歉邮件。我可以；他们不会结婚的&“<p> 那；这不是我想要生活的未来，我喜欢让机器为我工作。<p>这不是我想让我的孩子认为可以的。<p]我的一个朋友是一名教师，孩子们已经将他们的学习委托给ChatGPT，他们的学习不是；t粘<p> 当社交技能也被委派时会发生什么？ **seanvelasco**: I pay for 3 Workspace orgs, and I have Gemini disabled (or still not enabled) on all 3 of them. I'm angry that I'll have to pay more for features I don't use. Gemini should be an add-on cost, not included in the base cost<p>If they're raising the price of personal GMail, I don't have a problem. But Workspace with hundreds of users, now that's a problem, because it actually hurts my wallet significantly. When this increase comes, I'll have to move elsewhere. > **seanvelasco**: 我为3个Workspace组织付费，并且我在所有3个组织上都禁用了Gemini（或仍未启用）。我；我很生气；我将不得不为我没有的功能支付更多费用；t使用。Gemini应该是附加成本，不包括在基本成本中；重新提高个人GMail的价格，我不；我没有问题。但是拥有数百名用户的Workspace，现在；这是个问题，因为它实际上严重伤害了我的钱包。当这种增长到来时，我；我得搬到别处去。