【Hacker News搬运】OpenCat：开源机器人宠物四足动物框架
-
Title: OpenCat: Open-source robotic pet quadruped framework
OpenCat：开源机器人宠物四足动物框架
Text:
Url: https://www.petoi.com/pages/opencat-open-source-robot-pet-framework
很抱歉，当前尝试抓取指定网页内容时遇到了技术问题，导致无法获取和分析网页信息。如果您能提供更多的信息或者另一个网站链接，我可以尝试再次进行抓取和分析。Post by: kristianpaul
Comments:
skadamat: GitHub page is better & cleaner for those curious: <a href="https://github.com/PetoiCamp/OpenCat">https://github.com/PetoiCamp/OpenCat</a>
skadamat: GitHub页面更好&；为那些好奇的人提供清洁剂：<a href=“https://；/；github.com#xx2F；PetoiCamp/：OpenCat”>https:///；github.com/；PetoiCamp/；OpenCat</a>
clhodapp: Petoi had a rep at OpenSauce in San Francisco. I picked up a Nybble, because I like the look of Nybble better than Bittle.<p>It's a fun little toy and I really appreciate what Petoi are doing with the robots & the OpenCat framework! However... due to either a design flaw or my own subtle mistake in assembling it (haven't identified which yet), the poor cat's tail is too long! It hits the floor and topples the bot over!
clhodapp: Petoi在旧金山的OpenSauce有一个代表。我选了一个Nybble，因为我比Bittle更喜欢Nybble的外观<p> 它；这是一个有趣的小玩具，我真的很欣赏Petoi和机器人所做的一切；OpenCat框架！然而由于设计缺陷或我自己在组装时的细微错误（还没有确定是哪一个），可怜的猫；的尾巴太长了！它撞到地板上，把机器人推倒了！
tamimio: Despite their cool look and visually appealing design, QUGVs are still not optimal for practical real-world applications. Their limited mobility in comparison to UAVs for ISR operations, coupled with a mediocre payload capacity relative to traditional UGVs, results in a platform that have disadvantages from both categories. In my opinion, QUGVs are primarily beneficial for educational purposes or just a show or a ‘wow’ reaction from those outside the robotics field. For example, Boston Dynamics cannot descend stairs in reverse last time I checked, while Unitree tend to overheat rapidly, with internal components that are susceptible to failure, and they are constructed with cheap components, such as three Jetson Nanos, rather than a single, more robust SBC, etc.
tamimio: 尽管QUGV外观酷炫，设计极具视觉吸引力，但在现实世界的实际应用中仍然不是最佳选择。与ISR作战的无人机相比，它们的机动性有限，再加上与传统UGV相比，有效载荷能力平平，导致平台在这两类方面都有缺点。在我看来，QUGV主要是出于教育目的，或者只是机器人领域以外的人的一场表演或“哇”的反应。例如，我上次检查时，波士顿动力公司不能反向下楼梯，而Unitree往往会迅速过热，内部组件容易发生故障，而且它们是用廉价的组件建造的，比如三个Jetson Nano，而不是一个更坚固的SBC等。
gareth_untether: Charles Stross’s Accelerando comes to mind.
gareth_untether: 脑海中浮现出查尔斯·斯特劳斯的《加速器》。
jimsmart: I have Bittle, their Open Source robot dog. Got it when they were doing the kickstarter.<p>It’s pretty cool
jimsmart: 我有Bittle，他们的开源机器狗。当他们开始踢球的时候就得到了<p> 非常酷：）